Xiaomi Mi 9 T Testbericht
On this folio:
Questions answers
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro test, review and price
Xiaomi launched the T range in 2019 past commencement launching the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro followed by the Mi 9T. These two smartphones stand up out from the rest of the Xiaomi models by offering a popular-up camera that allows you to employ the entire screen. This technique is non new, other manufacturers have already launched smartphones with the same type of photographic camera. What changes this fourth dimension is that Xiaomi is the 1 who does it and past applying their usual formula, which is to offer a maximum at a lower price than the competition. Can this Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro face a Samsung Galaxy S10+ or 1 of the latest iPhone? That's what I'thou going to show you through this test.[b][b][b][b] Manufacturer web site: https://www.mi.com[b][b]
Structure of my tests
I test the phones according to a pre-established structure (encounter below) to provide yous with as much data every bit possible. Unfortunately, this takes a long time. Some tests similar network performance tests accept several days and for photo tests I sometimes have to wait until the weather is suitable to have pictures in skillful weather. I am therefore obliged to publish the tests stride by step, then I invite you to come back if the test is not complete at the fourth dimension of your visit.[b]How are my tests different from others on the spider web?
- I usually buy the devices with my own money, and then price is merely every bit important as you are!
- I keep the devices for at least a few weeks (sometimes more) to encounter what they are worth in real conditions.
- I answer (when possible) your questions to help you determine before you lot purchase
- no 1 pays me to practice these reviews, so I'thou completely neutral and contained...
- My pages are non filled with ads
Poco F4 : test / review
Poco X4 GT : test / review
Oukitel WP18: exam and review
Poco F4 GT: test / total review
Xiaomi Redmi Note viii Pro test / review and price
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 test, review and cost
Huawei Y6 2019 exam, review and price
Xiaomi Mi A3 test, review and toll
Umidigi S3 Pro examination, review and cost
Meizu Notation 9 examination, review and price
Price Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
The list below shows the prices for the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro from more than l sites effectually the world. If yous are non satisfied with any price, you can subscribe to a price alert to be the offset to exist notified when the cost drops.[b]Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Dual DIM 64GB 6GB RAM Flame Rot...
2022-07-11 07:35
145 EUR
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro – Smartphone con Pantalla AMOLED Full-Screen de 6,39" (Qualcomm SD 855, Selfie Po...
2022-07-11 07:43
178 EUR
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro – Smartphone con Pantalla AMOLED Full-Screen de 6,39" (Qualcomm SD 855, Selfie Po...
2022-07-11 07:43
181 EUR
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro – Smartphone con Pantalla AMOLED Total-Screen de 6,39" (Qualcomm SD 855, Selfie Po...
2022-07-11 07:43
196 EUR
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro – Smartphone con Pantalla AMOLED Full-Screen de 6,39" (Qualcomm SD 855, Selfie Po...
2022-07-11 07:43
206 EUR
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro – Smartphone Con Pantalla AMOLED Full-Screen de 6,39" (Qualcomm SD 855, Selfie Po...
2022-07-10 eighteen:14
228 EUR
The above links are affiliate links from companies such as Amazon, Gearbest, Aliexpress,... If you capeesh my work, I would be grateful if you could buy these products through these links. It costs you absolutely nothing but I get a pocket-sized commission that allows me to purchase the material I test. Thank yous very much!
Timeline
xv/11/2019: phone delivered from Gearbest[b]17/11/2019: unpacking and first impressions[b][b]Why this phone?
I'thousand not the first to examination the Mi 9T Pro, it is rarely the case because I don't receive manufacturers' phones when they are released. On paper this phone actually has everything you tin can expect from a phone today merely its toll is higher up what I usually pay, so I had fabricated the decision not to test it only I had the opportunity to test the phone without ownership it (this is very rare). I couldn't miss this opportunity.[b][b]Unpacking
[b]The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is packed in a classic box but Xiaomi has chosen black for the within and exterior of the box. Xiaomi probably wanted to stand up out from the usual white boxes to give a more than premium look to the Mi 9T Pro. Apart from the colour, the contents of the box are strictly the same as those usually plant on phones of this make.[b][b] 
Length : 156.7
Width : 74.three
Thickness : 8.8
Weight : 191
Jack output : Aye
USB Type : Blazon C
USB norm : 2.0
First configuration
[b]The showtime configuration of the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro follows the same process as the other Xiaomi I accept been able to examination in contempo months but Xiaomi has introduced a small variant to button its deject service. The person in accuse of this service was probably a footling behind with his objectives and he probably wanted to push information technology a fiddling past adding some screens in the configuration process. If you lot do not want to register for the Xiaomi cloud, you lot will have to pass up it several times. [b][b]I don't take an business relationship on the Xiaomi cloud, so I can't judge if this service is good or non, but if yous already have a Google account with Google Photos or Google Drive, a deject account at Xiaomi won't give y'all anything more. I often change from one phone to another and the fact that I can store everything in Google's cloud allows me to retrieve all my data (contacts, sms, applications,...) each fourth dimension I configure a new phone.[b][b][b][b]Finish
[b]The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is not an entry-level phone, only rather targets those who are used to ownership high-end phones while offering a much lower price. The level of finish must therefore be impeccable to convince a loyal Samsung or Apple customer to go for a Xiaomi. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is massive, it is heavier than a Samsung Galaxy S10+ (for a similar screen size) and you lot can feel information technology. This weight gives it an impression of forcefulness and the materials used do not deform. Xiaomi is mainly present in the mid-range only with this Mi 9T Pro, the Chinese clearly assault some other type of segment and the upshot is quite good.[b][b]
[b]The top of the phone is slightly different from the other models because Xiaomi has installed a camera for selfies that comes out simply when yous want to do a selfie. Xiaomi is not the offset to experiment with this kind of technique but they did it particularly well. The camera pops when you plow on the selfie manner on the camera and information technology automatically retracts when you lot are finished. This frees the screen from whatsoever constraints related to the front camera and gives y'all a real total screen experience. I don't use the selfie camera much, and so I like this kind of solution quite a lot and I hope other manufacturers will follow this new trend.[b][b]
[b]The bottom of the phone is also different from the other models. The SIM drawer of the Mi 9T Pro is located nether the telephone, information technology'south the first fourth dimension I've seen it, it replaces one of the grids that was finally useless because nigh phones are but equipped with ane speaker. Next to the SIM drawer, there is a USB type C port and a grid for the loudspeaker.[b][b]
[b]Since the SIM drawer is located at the bottom of the phone, the Mi 9T Pro has i side without any buttons. On the other side, in that location are the usual buttons for volume and start, the start button is reddish. [b][b]
[b]The back of the phone has a very special design, there is a dark central band on which nosotros find the photograph sensors and on the sides the color drifts towards a gradient of color. Information technology's a very special combination, everyone will have an stance, I clearly prefer the pattern on the back of the Mi nine Lite.[b][b]The photo sensor is positioned in the eye and protrudes very footling from the back of the phone. So you won't have the problem with the Redmi range where the phone is never really flat.[b][b]
[b]By moving the photo sensor for selfie to a popular-up module, Xiaomi managed to completely free the screen. In that location is e'er a border that is quite thin except at the bottom where the lower edge is slightly thicker than the balance of the device. We are no longer far from a phone without an border where the screen takes up 100% of the available infinite.[b][b]Specifications
[b]The information below comes from the Device Info HW application. The awarding provides detailed technical information about the tested phone.CPU / GPU Functioning
CPU : Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
GPU : Qualcomm AdreNo 640
Memory (RAM) : vi - 8Gb
Storage : 64 - 256 Gb
Criterion Antutu/3DMark
I go a score of 430,000 points with Antutu, it'south simply the best score of all the phones I've tested then far. I scored 335,000 points with the Samsung Galaxy S10+, the Mi 9T Pro is 28% higher. Fifty-fifty in the days of Samsung, I wondered what could brand this phone and then powerful information technology was. Six months later, Xiaomi sets the bar even higher and I wonder why manufacturers are nonetheless trying to do better considering no game seems greedy enough to accept full advantage of such ability. It is probably a marketing argument that allows users to say that they have one of the well-nigh powerful phones available.[b][b]Past pushing the phone all the style with Antutu and 3DMark, the back of the phone gets noticeably hot merely never to the signal of no longer existence able to agree the phone in your hand. Cooling is therefore particularly effective.[b][b][b][b] With 3DMark, I also get an incredible score with 5113 points for OpenGL and 4244 for Vulkan. Here besides, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro does meliorate than the Samsung.[b][b]Antutu score : 430403
Antutu CPU : 144197
Antutu GPU : 171321
Antutu UX : 56099
Antutu Mem : 58786
3D Mark Open up GL : 5113
3D Mark Vulkan : 4244
one. Poco F4 Gt - 853016
2. Realme Gt - 811858
3. Black Shark 4 Pro - 759986
iv. Poco X4 Gt - 714577
v. Oppo Discover X2 Pro - 605184
six. Oneplus 8t - 595000
7. Poco F3 - 589677
8. Xiaomi Mi 10t Pro - 581650
9. Oneplus 8 Pro - 579417
10. Xiaomi Mi 10 - 579114
Number of smartphones in the ranking:144
Position of this smartphone in the ranking:18/144
Note: this ranking only contains the phones I tested besides as a few others that I added for reference.
[b]Gaming[b]To test the operation in game, I download the mobile PUBG game and evaluate the in-game feel, graphics level and depth of vision. This game is quite demanding and should help you evaluating the functioning of a telephone.[b]With a score of over 400,000 points, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro volition permit you lot to play any game with the highest level of graphics. The Mi 9T Pro is one of the most powerful phones at the stop of 2019 and it will be a long time before we find games and applications that will be challenging for it. [b][b]
Network performance
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro covers the vast majority of frequencies in Europe, it even covers the B28 band in 700 MHz for Free customers in France[b][b]3G frequencies : B1, B2, B4, B5, B8
4G frequencies : B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B20, B28, B38, B40
Bluetooth : Bluetooth 5.0 LE
SAR / head : 1.302
SAR / torso : one.180
Volte : Yes
NFC : Yes
Number measurements : 1600
Boilerplate signal : -88
Number measurements : 669
Average signal (reference) : -93.69
Average indicate (telephone) : -95.84
Average deviation reference/telephone : -2.fifteen
Min/Max signal (reference) : -90 / -95
Min/Max bespeak (phone) : -92 / -98
Download speed : 121
Upload speed : sixty
Point 4G[b]The ability to choice up the network correctly is an essential element for a phone but it is only very rarely measured. To measure a telephone'southward ability to selection up the network, I perform a large number of measurements on the same cells to be able to compare phones under like conditions. The signal is measured in dBm, a value of -90dBm indicates a worse indicate than -70dBm. These measurements are therefore taken under real conditions and not in a laboratory, they are not scientific but give a good indication of functioning. [b][b]Network signal sensitivity rating
| Telephone tested: | Average signal (dBm) | Number of measurements: |
| Xiaomi Mi 9t Pro | -88 | 1600 |
| Xiaomi Redmi Notation 5 | -91.305 | 600 |
| Xiaomi Mi ix Lite | -93 | 788 |
| Samsung Galaxy A70 | -94.511 | 1975 |
| Nokia 5.3 | -94.98 | 531 |
| Realme 6 | -95.14 | 2301 |
| Xiaomi Redmi Annotation 8 Pro | -95.922 | 1599 |
| Xiaomi Mi A3 | -95.95 | thousand |
| Huawei Y6 2019 | -95.95 | 1199 |
| Doogee S58 Pro | -96.22 | 856 |
| Redmi 9a | -96.48 | yard |
| Meizu Annotation 9 | -96.68 | 937 |
| Motorola G8 Power | -96.88 | 1032 |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | -97.01 | 1430 |
| Redmi 9c | -97.04 | 1000 |
| Umidigi S3 Pro | -97.13 | 1200 |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | -97.34 | 879 |
| Samsung Galaxy A21s | -97.78 | 1000 |
| Umidigi F1 | -97.82 | 298 |
| Ulefone Armor 7e | -98.7 | 1000 |
| Xiaomi Mi Note ten Calorie-free | -99 | yard |
| Honour 9x | -99.xiv | 899 |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9s | -99.4 | 1860 |
| Poco F2 Pro | -99.8 | 1247 |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 | -100.79 | 1785 |
| Xiaomi Mi x Lite 5g | -100.88 | 1198 |
| Poco X3 | -101.19 | 821 |
| Umidigi F2 | -101.47 | 712 |
[b][b]I have been testing network performance with the same protocol for a twelvemonth now and with more than 15,000 measurements, I at present have enough data to compare the signal quality among all the phones I take tested. It was the first phone I tested that got the highest score (Redmi Notation v) with -91dBm. This phone exceeded emission standards and Xiaomi made a fix that lowered the phone in the ranking. Since and then I hadn't found a phone with such a score until I tested the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro.[b][b]Of all the phones I have tested, it is the Mi 9T Pro that gets the all-time result with a very comfortable advance because I got an average signal of -88 dBm. And so is this phone the all-time phone to pick upward the network? Maybe, merely I need to provide more information. For my other tests, I had used a Proximus subscription to perform my measurements but I now utilise a Proximus prepaid menu. I recall network access is different in prepaid because I got a lot more measurements in 3G than with other phones. [b][b]The comparison with another phone is done on common cells and I find withal that the Mi 9T Pro gets the best score. So I remember the great score comes from two things, the telephone is actually good simply the network has pushed me to 3G where the coverage is better.[b][b][b][b]Download/Upload speed[b]To exam the download speed, I have identified some 4G cells offering good operation where I test all my devices several times to encounter what download and upload speed they can achieve.[b]Summit 10 - speed ranking in download1. Samsung Galaxy S20 D:351Mbps U: 20Mbps
2. Poco X3 D:232Mbps U: 55Mbps
3. Xiaomi Mi x Lite 5g D:223Mbps U: 52Mbps
4. Poco F2 Pro D:207Mbps U: 53Mbps
v. Xiaomi Mi Notation 10 Lite D:153Mbps U: 68Mbps
6. Xiaomi Mi A3 D:150Mbps U: 60Mbps
7. Xiaomi Redmi Annotation 9s D:150Mbps U: 60Mbps
viii. Xiaomi Mi viii Lite D:149Mbps U: 60Mbps
9. Samsung Galaxy A21s D:147Mbps U: 51Mbps
10. Huawei Y6 2019 D:145Mbps U: 61Mbps
Number of smartphones in the ranking:30
Position of this smartphone in the ranking:thirteen/30
Note: the theoretical maximum speed of a telephone is often limited past the configuration of the mobile network and the congestion of the network at the time of the measurement. So perhaps you lot could go a higher speed on another network
[b]The network test of the Xiami Mi 9T Pro shows that it does a proficient job and this is also reflected in the download speed where I got more 110 Mbps in download, it has been months since I had a phone that exceeds 100 Mbps. When uploading I unremarkably get a event betwixt 40 and 60Mbps.[b][b]
Wifi functioning
To examination a telephone's power to receive the network properly, I take measurements near my router and then remotely (and always at the same place). This gives me an average in dBm where a value of -xc dBm indicates poorer performance than a value at -thirty dBm.[b]Wifi frequencies : 802.11a, 802.11ac, 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n, 802.11n 5GHz
Download speed : 191
Bespeak / shut : -25
Point / afar : -72
1. Poco F2 Pro -11dBm
2. Xiaomi Redmi Notation 10 Pro -12dBm
3. Realme Gt -12dBm
4. Samsung Galaxy A21s -13dBm
5. Redmi Note 11 Pro -13dBm
6. Oneplus Nord N100 -15dBm
7. Poco X3 Pro -15dBm
8. Poco F3 -15dBm
9. Redmi Note 9t -15dBm
10. Blackness Shark iv Pro -15dBm
Number of smartphones in the ranking:64
Position of this smartphone in the ranking:42/64
[b]Download/Upload speed[b]To test the speed in Wifi, I connect to my router in two.4Ghz and 5Ghz (if available) and apply the Ookla awarding to measure the speed.[b]
1. Redmi Annotation 11 Pro Plus 5g 866Mbps
2. Poco F4 Gt 866Mbps
3. Poco X4 Gt 866Mbps
four. Black Shark four Pro 866Mbps
five. Poco M4 Pro 4g 433Mbps
6. Poco X4 Pro 433Mbps
7. Redmi Notation 11 Pro 433Mbps
viii. Poco F3 398Mbps
ix. Oukitel Wp18 390Mbps
10. Poco X3 Pro 389Mbps
Number of smartphones in the ranking:62
Position of this smartphone in the ranking:39/62
Note: I have a 400Mbps line and a modem capable of delivering higher speed, only I can never be sure how much bandwidth is available when doing a test.
[b]
GPS functioning
[b]To test the quality of the GPS indicate I use the Offline Maps application and I brand the same train trip in pedestrian fashion. Why? In pedestrian mode, the GPS does non artificially correct the signal to stick to the road, information technology has no markings, so you tin run into the actual position. I and so apply an application to measure the accuracy of the betoken. [b]The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro picks up the GPS indicate very rapidly, information technology took only 2 seconds to find satellites and the accuracy quickly stabilized at 2 meters where other phones continue to fluctuate.[b][b][b]On the train route, the accuracy even seems to be amend than 2 meters because the bespeak does not seem to deviate from the railway rails, I practice not see any degradation of the betoken on the manner.[b][b][b][b][b][b]Top 10 - GPS accuracy ranking1. Oukitel C21 1m
2. Redmi 9a 1m
3. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10s 1m
4. Doogee S96 Pro 1m
5. Xiaomi Redmi Note nine 1m
vi. Umidigi Bison Pro 1m
7. Redmi 10 1m
viii. Tcl 30 Se 1m
9. Poco M4 Pro 1m
10. Poco M4 Pro 4g 1m
Number of smartphones in the ranking:34
Position of this smartphone in the ranking:0/34
Notation: An accurateness of iii meters or less can hands exist corrected by a good GPS application. Phone functioning also plays a role in how fast your display updates, and so skillful accuracy could be compromised by besides deadening a display.
[b]
Battery range
Capacity : 4000
Fast charge : Yes
W max : 27
Photo camera test
To test the quality of photos produced by a phone, I exercise a technical test (resolution, sharpness, chromatic aberration,...) in studio (identical atmospheric condition) to evaluate the technical role considerately. From the second half of 2020, I built my own laboratory to take completely objective technical measurements. I then accept pictures in existent conditions to encounter how the camera performs. I then evaluate these photos according to my criteria merely I publish the photos so that you can evaluate the result according to your criteria.[b]Hardware
Selfie / resolution : xx
Resolution : 48
Sensor : Sony IMX586 Exmor RS
Video resolution : 2160p
mm broad angle : four.77mm
mm ultra wide angle : 2.04mm
mm zoom : 5.54mm
Photoquality
Photograph exam / studio[b]First example: ƒ/one.75 1/100 4.77 mm 221 ISO[b]
[b]The chief sensor of the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro gives adept results in the studio because where many sensors cannot reproduce the brightness, the Sony sensor does very well. The sharpness is expert, the depth of field is narrow (this is normal with f/ane.75) and the colors are good although they should be a lilliputian more saturated. Blue is a trivial besides light, it's the aforementioned with ruddy. The groundwork used for the photo looks grainy just this is not the instance in reality, we run into here that the artificial processing of the phone plays a role.[b][b]2d example: ƒ/2.four 1/l 2.04 mm 100 ISO[b]
[b]The wide bending allows much less light to enter, then it must slow down the shutter speed. With good light this is not a problem merely if the brightness decreases, avoid using this sensor. The focal length here is 2.04mm, information technology'southward not the shortest focal length I've e'er tested, other Xiaomi are at one.66mm. The sharpness is adept but slightly less good than that offered by the chief sensor. The colours are also a trivial less saturated, just the depth of field is better than with the main sensor. This sensor should therefore be used for outdoor scenes and preferably in adept weather.[b][b]Third example: ƒ/ane.75 1/100 four.77 mm 174 ISO[b]
[b]The zoom fashion uses the main sensor via a digital zoom. The characteristics of the paradigm are the same as for the first photo but hither we can see much improve the aggressive treatment applied to the background of the photo. The back of my studio is clearly non noisy like that. The sharpness of the other elements of the photo is quite good, we can encounter the dust on the windshield of the car quite well.[b][b][b]Photo test / sunny[b]I'k testing the Mi 9T Pro at the same fourth dimension as the Mi 9 Low-cal because they both utilize the same sensor (Sony IMX 586), and then I was curious to see if Xiaomi had applied the same type of processing for the two phones. I did this photo test on a sunny day at the end of November, the light is not comparable with a summertime solar day, the colour of the light is oft warmer. The sky was blue but a trivial veiled.[b][b]EXIF: ƒ/one.75 i/1085 four.77 mm 112 ISO[b]
[b]The photo is very close to the reality, the colors are well respected and the sharpness is really practiced. The detail on the tree leaves is really good and fifty-fifty where the branches touch the sky, I don't see any chromatic aberration actualization. The picture is very similar to what I got with a Mi 9 Lite, the focal length is but a lilliputian different (4.77 on the 9T Pro against 4.74 on the Mi 9 Lite).[b][b]EXIF: ƒ/2.iv 1/555 2.04 mm 100 ISO[b]
[b]The use of the wide angle module does non touch on the quality of the photo too much. If we wait at the details, we notice that the saturation of the colours is not the same, the blue of the sky is budgeted cyan and some areas are a little likewise exposed (due east.g. cars on the span). The picture show is generally good because you accept to look at the details to find defects, the wide angle delivers sufficient quality for pictures taken in good weather condition. The focal length used is quite unusual, I have never had a broad angle at two.04mm before, then this sensor is completely unlike from the i used on the Mi nine Light.[b][b]EXIF: ƒ/2.iv 1/479 five.54 mm 100 ISO[b]
[b]I had taken the aforementioned film on the Mi 9 Lite and I found that the image was also abrupt, this is not at all the case on the Mi 9T Pro considering it is simply another sensor. Xiaomi usually associates a digital zoom with the zoom function just on the Mi 9T Pro, the focal length changes to 5.54mm instead of four.77mm. Fifty-fifty if I call up that Xiaomi combines a digital zoom with the use of another sensor, the quality obtained is amend. The sharpness is good without being forced. The colors are a little more bland than with the 4.77mm sensor simply the picture is correct as a whole.[b][b]EXIF: ƒ/1.75 1/1038 iv.77 mm 112 ISO[b]
[b]Using the nighttime mode in wide daylight is similar to using HDR by forcing the colors a footling. The event is quite good because fifty-fifty if the colors no longer stand for to reality, the processing has added a little saturation to the whole picture. Information technology is at the level of the sky that the effect is nigh visible, the heaven is bluer than in previous photos. This night way seems to work well when the light is good, I added another examples in the gallery beneath. It will be necessary to see if this night mode also works in bad weather.[b][b]For this test under the dominicus, the Mi 9T Pro managed to produce adept photos without overly aggressive treatment. These photos volition be good enough to be viewed on a larger screen.[b][b][b][b][b][b]Photo exam / cloudy[b][b]First example: ƒ/1.75 i/141 4.77 mm 112 ISO[b]
[b][b]Exposure: global under-exposure, over-exposure of the sky[b]Sharpness: ok[b]Colours: slightly too common cold [b]Depth of field: ok[b]Distortion: ok[b]Chromatic aberration: ok[b]Vignetting: ok[b]Digital noise: ok[b][b]The last Xiaomi I tested all tended to take too dark pictures on cloudy days and information technology was apparently a choice not to lose areas like the heaven with overexposure. The Mi 9T Pro uses a different type of setting equally the underexposure is not as pronounced and results in part of the sky being overexposed (completely white). The colors are non quite correct, the sky and h2o have a too pronounced imperial tint.[b][b]Nonetheless, I tin can't practise the difficult part because if yous don't compare this picture with the 1 that follows, you could say that the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is doing quite well but I had my DSLR at the same time so I tin compare.[b][b]
[b][b]The pic taken with my DSLR is plainly amend, the exposure and the colors are more authentic. Sharpness is also better, but the Xiaomi produces a motion-picture show that is overall sharp plenty for a phone.[b][b]Second example: ƒ/ane.75 1/666 4.77 mm 112 ISO[b]
[b][b]Exposure: global under-exposure, slight over-exposure of the sky.[b]Sharpness: ok[b]Colors: ok[b]Depth of field: ok[b]Distortion: ok[b]Chromatic aberration: ok[b]Vignetting: ok[b]Digital dissonance: ok[b][b]On this 2d photo I don't see any color problem similar the previous one, the photograph is also underexposed only keeps a maximum of details, we can see quite well the presence of seagulls in the groundwork while they simply occupy a few pixels on the photo. [b][b]Tertiary example: ƒ/2.4 ane/1493 2.04 mm 100 ISO[b]
[b][b]Exposure: global under-exposure, slight over-exposure of the sky.[b]Sharpness: medium[b]Colours: besides nighttime[b]Depth of field: ok[b]Distortion: slight[b]Chromatic aberration: ok[b]Vignetting: ok[b]Digital racket: ok[b][b]Wide-angle sensors on smartphones are not even so very effective as shortly as the lite weather condition are not practiced. The photo is globally underexposed and the sharpness is strongly degraded compared to the previous photo. The broad-angle sensor should but be used when the low-cal is adept.[b][b]4th example: ƒ/ane.75 1/374 4.77 mm 112 ISO[b]
[b][b]Exposure: overall under-exposure[b]Sharpness: good[b]Colors: heaven too saturated[b]Depth of field: ok[b]Distortion: ok[b]Chromatic abnormality: ok[b]Vignetting: ok[b]Digital noise: low-cal[b][b]The night manner used for this photo reinforces the dynamic range likewise much to reach a event a little unrealistic but which will undoubtedly please the amateurs of this kind of photograph. [b][b][b]Exam photograph / night[b]For this series of night shots, I took the Due north Station in Brussels as the setting. It was windy and some of the pictures are slightly blurry while those where I wasn't in the air current are clear.[b][b]Commencement case: ƒ/i.75 1/20 4.77 mm 1829 ISO[b]
[b]With a shutter speed of 1/20, y'all don't have to move also much and unfortunately I moved slightly. The picture is yet quite interesting overall considering with ISO 1829, there should exist digital noise only it is actually very picayune visible. Zooming in a trivial fleck you volition see a form of detail smoothing that has the effect of eliminating digital racket but also smoothes some details. The contours of the shapes are yet quite precipitous but the details disappear. The exposure is good, the colors too. The Sony sensor therefore does quite well in night style.[b][b]2nd instance: ƒ/2.iv 1/14 ii.04 mm 3292 ISO[b]
[b]The wide angle is fifty-fifty more subject to motion blur than the focal length of the get-go motion picture. With a shutter speed of 1/14, y'all ideally need to rely on something to go a clear picture. The broad angle is e'er darker than the normal zoom. The colors are like to the first picture just the sharpness is non as adept, partly considering of the movement simply also because of the lens used. Wide angle is not the all-time candidate for dark photography, it is the same problem on all the phones I accept tested.[b][b]Third example: ƒ/1.75 1/twenty 4.77 mm 1322 ISO[b]
[b]Using an optical zoom for night photography is non a skilful idea in principle, simply I call up the result is quite good. I didn't motion this time and we see that the sensor is able to capture many details despite the smoothing. We can almost see the details of the furniture in the buildings. [b][b]Quaternary case: ƒ/1.75 ane/20 4.77 mm 3160 ISO[b]
[b]With night mode, Xiaomi combines multiple photos to increase overall exposure. It is a process that has already proven itself on other models and despite the fact that I have moved slightly, the result is quite good. Yous will run into on the following pictures that when I am not exposed to the wind, the sharpness of the pictures is much better. The night mode allows you to amplify the dynamics of the photo to make it virtually more than cute than reality. The sharpness is good, the colors are a little exaggerated but it's prissy to wait at and the exposure is good. Of grade if objects are moving during the taking of the 3 pictures, they will be blurry but this is normal.[b][b][b][b][b]Video quality
Stabilisation[b]The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is the most expensive Xiaomi I've been able to test and so far and I hoped information technology would be able to compete with the Samsung Milky way S10+ for stabilization but that's not the case. In fact, I haven't seen effective stabilization on a Xiaomi yet. On the videos below, you tin encounter quite conspicuously the shaking caused by my footsteps. [b][b]Video normale weather[b]The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is able to shoot in 4k and it is visible, the sharpness of the video is really good. The fluidity is too proficient, at that place are no judder during horizontal movements. The stabilization is not efficient enough to blot the vibrations of my steps. The global exposure is quite adept, the sky is non overexposed and the ground is not nether-exposed, the video is quite well counterbalanced.[b][b][b][b]Video depression lite[b]Non yet bachelor / tested[b][b]Audio quality
To test the quality of the phone'south audio output, I connect the device'south audio output to a measuring tool, then play sounds on all frequencies and measure out the differences betwixt the original sound and the sound produced by the phone. In this style I measure the phone's power to correctly reproduce all sounds.[b]Frequency Respons : +0.02 / -0.06
Noise Level : -93.1
Dynamic Range : 93.1
THD : 0.00244
Intermodulation : 0.00754
Stereo crosstalk : -85
[b][b]Frequency reproduction is proficient over most of the frequency range. It deviates a fiddling from the reference in low-pitched and very loftier-pitched sounds just the Mi 9T Pro'southward line is very close to that of the Samsung Galaxy S10+ [b][b]Dynamic Range[b]This test is designed to test a telephone's ability to play sounds at different volume levels. Here too, the phones must exist as close as possible to the reference.[b]
[b][b]Here again we meet that the Mi 9T Pro follows the Samsung Galaxy S10+ line quite well, it manages to reproduce the frequencies correctly at low and high volume. Distortion is as well very low even with maximum book.[b][b]Racket Level[b]This test aims to identify if the device under test is able to reproduce sounds without too much noise. A high score indicates a low parasite charge per unit, a lower score indicates a higher presence of parasites.
[b][b]Every bit with the other two tests, the Mi 9T Pro follows the performance of the Milky way S10+, but is weaker in low-pitched sounds and then eventually joins the Samsung curve for high-pitched sounds. What can also differentiate the listening quality is the quality of the external speaker, the Samsung outputs stereo audio with Dolby, this is not the instance with the Xiaomi.[b][b]Concert recording[b]The purpose of this test is to measure out the recording quality of the telephone when there is a lot of ambience noise. Since I don't have the opportunity to go to a concert every time I exam a phone, I simulate the noise of a concert in a closed environment. Screen quality
To test the screen, I use a colorimetric probe that measures the color accurateness of a screen, likewise equally other parameters to come across if a screen is able to correctly reproduce an image. I also examination the brightness level to make up one's mind if the screen volition be able to display an paradigm in full sunlight.[b]Screen size : 6.39
Resolution : 1080 ten 2340
Ratio : 19.5:9
Protection : Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Type : Amoled
% occupancy : 86
dE white : 3.seven
dE red : ii.6
dE green : i.1
dE blueish : i.viii
dE jaune : ii.i
dE cyan : ane.2
dE magenta : 2.3
Dissimilarity : 60000:1
Brightness : 600
[b]The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro uses an AMOLED screen, this type of screen provides a huge reward in terms of contrast considering blacks are in theory really black (instead of being very nighttime grey), and then you lot get a improve contrast ratio. Equally soon equally the Mi 9T Pro is switched on, you will see the "Mi" white logo on a black background, the blacks are indeed perfect. I and then tested the main and secondary colors, the result is as well very good, I go a dE of two.xi. With such a score the Mi 9T Pro ranks second behind the Samsung Galaxy S10+ which remains the reference among the phones I have tested. The colorimetry is accurate, it is in the white and crimson that the Mi 9T Pro gets a slightly worse score but these differences are non perceptible to the naked eye.[b][b][b]Tiptop 10 - ranking of the best screens by colorimetry1. Poco X4 Gt dE = 0.half-dozen
2. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g dE = 0.73
3. Xiaomi Mi 10t Pro dE = 0.83
iv. Redmi Notation 11 dE = 0.91
5. Google Pixel 5 dE = 1.eleven
six. Realme Gt dE = i.17
7. Xiaomi Mi 11 Calorie-free dE = i.xix
8. Xiaomi Redmi Notation viii dE = i.2
9. Xiaomi Redmi Note x dE = 1.23
10. Poco M4 Pro 4g dE = one.31
Number of smartphones in the ranking:64
Position of this smartphone in the ranking:28/64
Note: the colorimetric departure is measured in dE. After iii, the human being middle will perceive a colorimetric difference, so the dE should be the lowest. The tests were all carried out with a colorimetric probe.
[b]Brightness / Contrast[b]I measured a brightness greater than 600 cd/yard², it is more than enough to apply the telephone in the sun. Hither too, the Mi 9T Pro comes nether the Samsung Milky way S10+ but you probably won't run across any deviation. The treatment of the phone surface likewise seems unlike because the screen seems to reflect less light but information technology is only a subjective feeling. On other phones I discover that the mirror event is more than pronounced.[b][b][b] As I wrote above, the contrast ratio is huge, the blacks are actually black, so the screen delivers a cute epitome quality. [b][b]Light Absorption/Reflection[b]The smartphone screen reverberate calorie-free and sometimes plough them into a existent mirror. This mirror consequence makes it harder to read. [b][b]The assimilation index beneath indicates the percentage of light captivated by the screen. The readability of a screen is meliorate when the assimilation alphabetize is loftier.[b][b]
| Phone tested: | % lite absorption |
| Samsung Galaxy S10+ | 58 |
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | 52 |
| Award 9x | 65 |
| Redmi Note 9s | 55 |
| Motorola G8 Power | 60 |
| Realme 6 | 54 |
| Umidigi F2 | 48 |
| Poco F2 Pro | 52 |
| Redmi Notation ix | 56 |
| Xiaomi Mi Notation x Lite | 53 |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 | 47 |
| Samsung Galaxy A21s | 53 |
Biometry
The Xiaomi Mi 9T can be unlocked by code, 2nd facial recognition or on-screen fingerprint sensor.[b][b]Since the front camera is not on the screen, it must be pulled out every time you desire to unlock the phone. The photographic camera pops out of the phone fairly quickly, but recognition volition ever be slower than a phone with a photographic camera built into the screen. I concluded up disabling this recognition mode considering I didn't observe it very practical. [b][b]I tested several phones with a fingerprint sensor under the screen and I was disappointed each time. You really have to await for the ideal position to put your finger on the sensor and it always wastes a bit of time. The position of the sensor is not very platonic either, I adopt a fingerprint sensor on the dorsum of the phone.[b][b]I accept also noticed that the fingerprint sensor tends to lite up when the phone is in my pocket, I have had this feedback from other people using this device. This slightly affects the bombardment life.[b][b]In the cease I ended up disabling facial recognition and the fingerprint sensor to use a code because it'due south unfortunately faster.[b][b]Operating system
Not withal available / tested[b][b][b]Encoutered bugs
Non nevertheless bachelor / tested[b][b]Accessories Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
To better enjoy your experience with your smartphone, I offer links to all kinds of accessories that you might find usefulProtective encompass / instance xiaomi mi 9t pro
Screen protection film xiaomi mi 9t pro
Memory card xiaomi mi 9t pro
USB Cablevision / Charger xiaomi mi 9t pro
Headphones xiaomi mi 9t pro
Bike rack xiaomi mi 9t pro
Compare Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro with the others
I assigned a score of 1 to 10 for each test that determines the strengths and weaknesses of a production. I am using 0 for criteria that accept not (yet) been tested. A score of 1 to 3 indicates poor performance (and yeah, it does), a score of 4 to half dozen indicates boilerplate operation, a score of 7 to 8 indicates good performance, and a score of 9 and ten indicates exceptional operation. .The score is calculated based on my measurements and when at that place are no measurements, it is a subjective opinion based on my experience.
The scores are not static, they change over time considering the performance of new products changes and this must be taken into account.
| Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | ||
| Finish quality | eight.00 | six.00 |
| Battery performance | 7.00 | viii.00 |
| CPU operation | 8.00 | six.five |
| GPU performance | 8.00 | 6.5 |
| Screen quality | 8.00 | 7.00 |
| Photo quality | viii.00 | 5.00 |
| Video quality | 8.00 | 5.00 |
| Wi-Fi operation | vii.00 | 7.00 |
| Mobile download speed | half-dozen.00 | 5.00 |
| Mobile network sensitivity | 8.00 | six.00 |
| Frequency coverage | 7.00 | 7.00 |
| Audio quality | viii.00 | 6.00 |
| GPS performance | 7.00 | six.00 |
| Operating system | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Overall score | 106 | 89 |
1. Black Shark 4 Pro 114 / 140
2. Realme Gt 112.five / 140
three. Poco F2 Pro 111.5 / 140
four. Poco F3 111.five / 140
5. Samsung Galaxy S20 111 / 140
6. Poco F4 Gt 110.v / 140
7. Google Pixel five 109.vi / 140
8. Poco X3 Pro 107.5 / 140
9. Xiaomi 11t 107 / 140
10. Samsung Galaxy S10+ 107 / 140
11. Redmi Note eleven Pro Plus 5g 106.5 / 140
12. Xiaomi Mi 9t Pro 106 / 140
13. Xiaomi Redmi Annotation x Pro 105.5 / 140
14. Xiaomi Mi 11 Calorie-free 104 / 140
fifteen. Tcl 10 Pro 104 / 140
16. Samsung Galaxy A52 104 / 140
17. Redmi Note 11 Pro 103 / 140
eighteen. Poco X4 Pro 102.5 / 140
nineteen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10s 102 / 140
twenty. Poco M4 Pro 4g 102 / 140
21. Poco M4 Pro 101.five / 140
22. Xiaomi Mi Annotation x Calorie-free 101 / 140
23. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5g 101 / 140
24. Poco X3 101 / 140
25. Redmi Notation 11 101 / 140
26. Xiaomi Redmi Annotation 10 101 / 140
27. Redmi Note 9t 100.5 / 140
28. Xiaomi Redmi Notation viii Pro 100 / 140
29. Poco M3 Pro 98 / 140
thirty. Xiaomi Redmi Notation 9s 98 / 140
31. Doogee S96 Pro 98 / 140
32. Xiaomi Mi ix Low-cal 98 / 140
33. Redmi 10 97.5 / 140
34. Xiaomi Redmi Notation 8 97 / 140
35. Umidigi Bison Pro 95 / 140
36. F150 R2022 95 / 140
37. Poco M3 94.5 / 140
38. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 94 / 140
39. Realme half-dozen 93 / 140
40. Tcl 30 Se 92 / 140
41. Umidigi Bison 92 / 140
42. Umidigi A9 Pro 92 / 140
43. Oukitel C21 89.5 / 140
44. Nokia 5.3 89 / 140
45. Xiaomi Mi A3 89 / 140
46. Motorola G8 Power 89 / 140
47. Xiaomi Redmi Note nine 89 / 140
48. Oneplus Nord N100 88.5 / 140
49. Honor 9x 88 / 140
50. Meizu Note 9 86 / 140
51. Xiaomi Mi eight Light 86 / 140
52. Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 85 / 140
53. Umidigi S3 Pro 83 / 140
54. Samsung Galaxy A21s 82 / 140
55. Umidigi F2 82 / 140
56. Oukitel Wp18 81 / 140
57. Redmi 9a 81 / 140
58. Redmi 9c 80 / 140
59. Ulefone Armor 7e eighty / 140
60. Doogee S58 Pro 78.v / 140
61. Honor 8x 78 / 140
62. Umidigi F1 77 / 140
63. Huawei Y6 2019 74 / 140
64. Xiaomi Mi 10t Pro 57 / 70
65. Elephone U5 0 / 0
Examination / Review decision
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro should exist seen as a high-terminate phone in the Xiaomi range. At the time of this test, just the Mi Notation 10 was more expensive. [b][b]Is information technology possible to compare this Mi 9T Pro with a high-end telephone like the Samsung Galaxy S10+? Yes, and this is probably what Xiaomi wants.[b][b]I don't find the Mi 9T Pro very elegant just the end is quite comparable to the Samsung ane. The phone looks solid and the materials used do not deform like on inexpensive phones.[b][b]The screen is bright and displays correct colors, this is the second best screen I could test (the outset one is the Samsung Galaxy S10+).[b][b]In terms of operation, the Xiaomi crushes the Samsung, it offers 30% more power. I don't really know what can be washed with this additional thirty% only gamers will surely love this.[b][b]For the photograph the Mi 9T Pro is quite versatile. It is not nonetheless at the level of the Samsung. It will let you to accept good pictures day and nighttime with sometimes unpredictable beliefs when the light is low. [b][b]I was positively surprised by the Mi 9T Pro's score for network capture, it'south only the best phone I've been able to test so far. We'll have to see if it doesn't hide a too high SAR rating as was the case with the Redmi Annotation 5 when it was released.[b][b]In this price range, you probably won't find phones that tin can compete with the Xiaomi. RealMe is venturing into the aforementioned field as Xiaomi but I haven't had the opportunity to test a phone of this brand to compare.[b][b][b]Strengths[b]Performance cpu/gpu[b]4G signal performance[b]GPS signal performance[b]Screen quality[b]Camera selfie pop up[b]Photo/video quality (especially day/night)[b][b][b]Weaknesses[b]Biometrics[b]MIUI parameters have become too circuitous[b]Heavier than average[b][b][b]Alternatives to this product[b][b] I run this site in my own name and completely independently, no one pays me to do so. I have more than than xx years of experience in the digital world, I accept managed and adult many high traffic websites in companies in Kingdom of belgium such as Mobistar, Microsoft, Immoweb, BrusselsAirlines, Proximus, Orangish,...
Laurent Willen
Instead of watching nonsense on Idiot box or YouTube, I spend my time in the evenings testing products and sharing my passion for technology, travel and photography.
arrow_forward
arrow_back
close
Source: https://www.laurentwillen.be/en/test-reviews/xiaomi-mi-9t-pro-test-review-and-price/
Posted by: fabriziotwoured.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Xiaomi Mi 9 T Testbericht"
Post a Comment